There are a ton of dead launchers and storefronts that died because the player chose to go with Steam, which is very different than Valve forcing a monopoly. But they didn't really do anything to force a monopoly other than develop Steam to be far better than the myriad other options out there. Valve 'forced' people to download Steam for their own games, which I think is pretty fair considering the plans they had for TF2 and creating a centralized hub for their own games. There were a ton of launchers around back in the day, or other options to publish like GOG (who it may surprise some people to know, back in the day were far stricter than Steam about what they'd allow on their platform in extremely dubious ways). I'm not gonna share my specific opinions on this, but this person is right - Valve didn't really force a monopoly.

They created a platform that to a lot of people, was preferable to jack-sparrowing games.ĭisclaimer: I'm a Steamworks developer, although I haven't released a game on the platform since 2016, but Valve has always been good to work with so I'm obviously biased towards them in some sense, but I don't think that makes what I'm gonna say any less objectively true. Steam never forced any developers to be on their store.Īnd games can still be sold on other sites that you can download from there.Ī launcher that managed all your games, or most of them.

I am against Epic paying money to publishers to force me to use their launcher. Ideally, all games should be available in every store at the same time. Originally posted by Pua:Where do all these people come from? Hating Steam and using Steam forums.Īnyway, I am not against Epic.

Tchia playstation download